 |
Kathleen
has a unique message for many markets.
|
|
DISTINGUISHING
AMONG DOLPHINS
Presidential hopefuls and dolphinsis there really a difference?
For our nations sake lets hope so. Better yetlets
profile the topic of illegal immigration to help make it so!
As presidential
hopefuls surface from the calm waters of political correctness, it might
be a little difficult at first to distinguish them from dolphins. Both
groups are slick, shinny, and smooth. They briefly pierce the waters
surface and then quickly disappear from sight. Who can blame themthe
glare of public scrutiny gets very old very quickly.
Dolphins can be
expected to return to view when they need to take in more air. Presidential
hopefuls, on the other hand, return to view when they want or need to
blow out more airhot or otherwise! Recognizing this difference
puts you well on the way to distinguishing between the two groups. Having
been a political candidate myself, I offer these comments as helpful
observations and not criticisms.
While dolphins are
quite content being one of manypeas in a "pod" so to
speak, presidential hopefuls seek and need to distinguish themselves
from fellow candidates. Voters seek to find the reasons to vote for
one candidate over another. Candidates are always seeking to find an
issue and position that will distinguish them from the rest of the pack.
Unfortunately, all to often important issues that will really do that
are avoided by candidates. The courage to distinguish themselves on
uncomfortable but very important issues is hard to come by. Illegal
immigration is one such uncomfortable topic.
Any American seeking
the highest office in the land should be required to state what they
would do to bring this serious problem under control. Our once sovereign
borders between Canada and Mexico have gone the way of the global village.
They are meaningless, and an overburdened and under staffed Immigration
and Naturalization Service (INS) simply cannot cope. Texas, Arizona
and California for example are all being subjected to hordes of Latin
Americans crossing into the United States illegally.
The current tactic
of these desperate illegal immigrants is to cross over at points along
the border where they know no Border Patrols are to be found. There
are hundreds of such miles. Douglas, Arizona a small town 120 miles
southeast of Tucson recently experienced 600 illegals in mob formation.
The trail of illegal immigrants is constantly strewn with cut fences,
butchered cattle, cut water lines, piles of excrement, soiled diapers
etc., etc.. The American citizens in Douglas and its environs can no
longer leave their homes unoccupied for fear of the hordes moving through
which take what they need. This is not a fairytale. It is real life
in America today. Spokesman Rob Daniels of the Border Patrol Tucson
sector has gone on record as explaining that Cochise County Arizona
and the Douglas municipal area "has become the busiest sector in
the nation. Already this year, weve turned back 250,000 illegals,
and the year isnt even half through." Senate hearings held
this year only confirmed this and far more as testimony was heard from
various parts of the country.
The chief of the
INS, Mr. Gus de la Vina admitted at this Senate hearing that at best
the service might be able to provide 100 to 150 agents for this area.
He said that in spite of the fact that the law mandates that the INS
bring the border partrol up to strength by hiring at least 1000 new
agents annually through 2001.
The drain on all
resources and citizens of the United States is almost beyond measure
with this problem. Aside from abusing the social programs setup for
legal immigrants and needy Americans, there is evidence that numerous
illegal immigrants are using this avenue as cover for drug couriers.
Once in the United States they disappear into our open society bringing
their "trade" with them.
Illegal immigration
is not a state level problem---it is a national policy problem. It should
be a major issue in the presidential election campaign of 2000. Regardless
of political affiliation, anyone seeking to lead this country should
be more then willing to know this issue and substantively speak to this
issue.
A presidential candidate
worth voting for would have the courage to make this an issue. More
importantly, Americans should demand that illegal immigration be a national
campaign issue. It is our children, our resources and our sovereignty
that are being abused. A willingness to defend all of these would distinguish
any candidate.
Permission
granted to reprint in full or part with full credit given to author.